Update this timeline entry

Arredondo said Oglethorpe dreamed that English kings granted GA

Source: Historical proof of the right of the Catholic King to the territory held to-day by the British King under the name of New Georgia #558

Project ID

Chapter

Timeline title

Start date

End date

Filename received

Filename assigned

Content

29. As to the statement that Kings James I, Charles I, and Charles II had granted to the Lords Proprietors all of the lands as far as 29°, neither is it true, nor is it an argument of justificatory force. For, through lack of authority they could not do it, and therefore these kings only gave patents of possession to the country as far as Charleston, inclusive, as is seen in the counties, seigniories, and baronies of Edward, Count of Clarendon; George, Duke of Albemarle; William, Count of Craven; John, Lord of Berkeley; George Carteret and John Colleton, knight-baronets; and Anthony, Lord Ashley, which are all comprehended in the jurisdiction of South Carolina, as is shown in all the maps and well known to all the world. 78. [Bolton note: Sir William Berkeley's name is omitted. For the Carolina charter, see Carroll, Historical Collections of South Carolina, II, 41.] In view of this, it clearly appears that Oglethorpe, confusing the anterior rights with the posterior, wished that the grant which was limited on the south by Charleston should extend itself as far as 29°, solely because he said so, perhaps without more authority than having dreamed it, and without paying attention to the fact that the land under discussion was inhabited by Spaniards at the time when the sovereigns named issued the patents, and without bearing in mind that if the lords above-mentioned had had greater privileges in their patents they would not have failed to take full advantage of them, which is proved by the fact that they did not do it. Therefore, up to the year 1702, the Spaniards did not voluntarily leave unoccupied and deserted the lands comprehended between the San Juan River and Santa Catharina.

30. Note how clearly and distinctly it is proved, both by events posterior to the patents cited by Oglethorpe, and by the context of the patent granted to the Company of New Georgia, that this territory in question has never been given by the sovereigns of England to any of their subjects, and that Oglethorpe's pretext to the official was made either with intentional equivocation or with malice. For if the predecessors of the British king then reigning had given to the lords mentioned possession of the lands spoken of, he would not have been able to form the Company of New Georgia. Nor would there have been any unoccupied territory in this region, as the same clause of the patent issued in favor of the company assumes. Hence the seigniories, counties, and baronies of the lords named in the preceding paragraph could not, and must not, extend further than to South Carolina, inclusive. 81. [Bolton note: Here again Arredondo uses South Carolina for Charleston.]

31. Finally, if Oglethorpe had really known that the lands which he was settling actually belonged by good title to the crown of Great Britain, and that the claim of the Spaniards was ill-founded, in fulfillment of his obligation, and in view of the right which in that case he would have had on his side, it would have been easy for him to convince the official of Havana. In consequence, the demands and complaints which the latter made to him that he should demolish the fort erected at San Juan and completely remove that settlement would have had no effect. But since the result of their conferences was that the Englishmen totally abandoned the post, as has been seen, there is no doubt that he lacked solid reasons to offer against those presented to him by the official mentioned in favor of the right of the king his master.